Last Updated on 02/08/2024 by wccexam Desk
Court News: The dispute between Punjab and Haryana government over Shambhu border is in the Supreme Court. The case was heard on Friday. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared on behalf of Haryana in the court and he asked the court for time to finalize the name of the expert and appealed to postpone the hearing. The next hearing of the case will be on August 12.
Status quo will remain intact on Shambhu border
While hearing the case, the Supreme Court said that both the state governments (Punjab and Haryana) should consider our suggestion and inform us. In fact, the Supreme Court said that both the states should find a solution. The next hearing of the case will be on August 12. Till then the status quo will remain on the Shambhu border.
Haryana appealed to postpone the hearing
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, on behalf of Haryana, said that during the last hearing, the court had asked for the name of an expert who could talk to the government and the protesting farmers. It is taking time to finalise the name, so the hearing should be postponed till Friday. The Supreme Court told the Punjab government that in a democracy, everyone has the right to express their views.
- Waste water coming out from RO, use it like this
- What was there in Yogi government’s bill on Nazul land that even BJP MLAs protested against it? Read full details
- Ayodhya rape case: Yogi government intensifies action, SHO-outpost incharge suspended
- How many new trains were run in five years? Railway Minister told in Parliament, also counted Vande Bharat
- 24 students of LPU are participating in Paris Olympics 2024, this is the second largest contingent after Stanford University of America in the Olympics
Give us a week’s time – Tushar Mehta
The Haryana government said that there is no side on behalf of the farmers in the court. Neither was there in the Punjab High Court nor in the Supreme Court, SG Tushar Mehta said that we are ready to discuss and form a committee. Give us a week’s time. Solicitor General said that the solution to all this is to open the border.
The court said that the petitioner has some good suggestions, suppose if an ambulance or a car carrying senior citizens is coming, then they cannot go on foot. The Supreme Court sought names from both the state governments who will talk to the farmers.