The Supreme Court of India has ordered that the Shambhu border between Haryana and Punjab will remain closed, maintaining the status quo following a challenge by the Haryana government against a recent High Court ruling. This decision stems from a complex situation involving ongoing farmer protests and concerns over public safety.
Background of the Shambhu Border Closure
The Shambhu border has been a focal point of tension since February 2024, when the Haryana government erected barricades on the Ambala-New Delhi national highway. This action was taken in response to farmers’ unions from Punjab planning a march to Delhi, advocating for various demands, including a legal guarantee for minimum support prices (MSP) for crops. The barricades effectively blocked access and have been a source of significant public inconvenience, as the border serves as a critical transit point for citizens traveling between Punjab, Haryana, and beyond to Delhi and Jammu and Kashmir.
Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling
On July 10, the Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered the Haryana government to open the Shambhu border within a week on an experimental basis, citing the need to alleviate public inconvenience. However, the Haryana government contested this order, arguing that the High Court had not fully considered the potential law and order issues arising from the presence of a large number of protesting farmers at the site. The government highlighted that around 500 agitators, along with numerous vehicles, were still at the border, posing a risk to public safety and property.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear Haryana’s appeal and subsequently ordered that the status quo be maintained, effectively keeping the border closed for the time being. The court emphasized that while the state has a duty to regulate traffic, it cannot arbitrarily block a highway, urging the Haryana government to manage the situation without impeding public access.
- Flood and rain havoc is not stopping in Gujarat
- Akhilesh and Sanjay Raut reached to support Jagan Mohan Reddy, will YSRCP become a part of INDIA alliance?
- Huge explosion in hot water fountain in Yellowstone National Park, will the apocalypse start from here?
- Now income up to Rs 1.25 lakh is tax free… then why are you disappointed about capital gains tax? Understand in 5 points
- Harris’s path is not easy even after Biden’s withdrawal from the presidential race, why are big leaders including Obama not supporting her?
Implications of the Ruling
This ruling not only reflects the ongoing conflict between the state government and protesting farmers but also underscores the delicate balance between maintaining public order and ensuring the rights of citizens to move freely. The High Court’s earlier decision was seen as a move to address public grievances, while the Supreme Court’s intervention highlights the complexities involved in managing civil unrest.
The Haryana government has expressed concerns that reopening the border under the current circumstances could lead to serious law and order repercussions, complicating efforts to restore normalcy in the area. The situation remains fluid, with the Supreme Court set to revisit the matter in future hearings, indicating that the resolution of this issue will require careful navigation of both legal and social dynamics.